COST AVOIDANCE MAKES MORE SENSE THAN ‘PAY AND CHASE’

COST AVOIDANCE SAVES MEDICAID PLANS MILLIONS SYRTIS SOLUTIONS PROTPL TPL COB CLAIMS ADJUDICATION PAY AND CHASE

COST AVOIDANCE MAKES MORE SENSE THAN ‘PAY AND CHASE’

Medicaid has become an integral safety net program that offers access to health care for millions of Americans. Payment for this health care is either delegated to Medicaid or other third party insurance coverage. In 2012, 7.6 million people on Medicaid had other private insurance coverage, and 10.6 million had other public coverage. Medicaid is regarded as the “payer of last resort”: if the Medicaid beneficiary has supplemental insurance, that third party insurance is liable for primary payment. The additional coverage is commonly called third party liability (TPL) and creates cost savings for Medicaid by rerouting payment to other forms of insurance before Medicaid must pay. Unfortunately, Medicaid is losing billions of dollars a year because plans are unable to identify TPL.

Identifying TPL is a very complex undertaking due to siloed data, antiquated technologies, and network latency. Medicaid plans try to ascertain liable third parties by utilizing data matching in several health care data sources. However, they are seldom updated and create several barriers. The difficulty of identifying accurate TPL frustrates those on the frontlines and creates a stressful, time-consuming search that only occasionally generates results. Pharmacy and medical claims may already be in progress or completed when TPL is identified. In that case, Medicaid scrambles to get reimbursed for the money they paid for the health care provided when it should have been delegated to a third party for payment. This scrambling is called ‘‘pay-and-chase’: Medicaid chases the payment from the third party. Once Medicaid plans determine the liable third party payer, they rarely receive a full refund from the amount originally distributed, and it’s costing the program billions of dollars in waste. Generally, Medicaid only recovers a mere 17% of funds used for payment through the ‘pay and chase’ method. ‘Pay and chase’ is clearly ineffective and inefficient. Searching for TPL, identifying the correct distributor, and replacing funds all take additional time and increased administrative costs.

The obvious solution for all parties involved is to identify TPL at the start of the coordination of benefits. Providers are paid faster, administrators have ease identifying the accurate payment provider, and Medicaid enrollees have their services covered. Finding solutions for prospective TPL identification should be made a priority, especially for a program with such a wide scope and reach as Medicaid. Medicaid plans agree that cost avoidance makes more sense, but up until this point, the ability to execute it successfully has not been widely available.

Syrtis Solutions saw that Medicaid plans needed a way to identify active OHI coverage so that claims could be adjudicated correctly. So, in 2010, they launched ProTPL, a real-time point of sale cost avoidance service for the payer of last resort market. ProTPL delivers powerful and accurate eligibility data that can be acted upon. The solution enables plans to cost avoid Rx and medical claims and the associated costs of recovery. Additionally, the coverage identified by ProTPL can not be found by other vendors. Syrtis Solutions is able to accomplish this by checking claims against the nation’s largest and most complete active healthcare coverage information database. Health plans that implement ProTPL see an average 25% increase in OHI discovery. This means Syrtis’ customers get the best and most current eligibility responses when they need them.

Identifying primary commercial insurance coverage is extremely challenging for payers of last resort. Because of the complexity of COB, the near-constant change in the Medicaid population, and poor quality eligibility data, health plans depend heavily on retrospective identification and recovery. Unfortunately, this is costing Medicaid billions in waste. Plan administrators should look to true TPL technology solutions for further efficiency and cost avoidance opportunities to protect program resources and ensure that vulnerable populations receive the care they need.

Click this link to learn more.